Skip to content

Home / Insights / Contract termination: what cannot be assumed

Contract termination: what cannot be assumed

Delay, penalties, silence and notice: six points that often cause disputes when a contract comes to an end.

Oct 13, 2026 · 2 min read · Civil and Consumer Law

Ending a contract seems simple until the parties disagree on how, when and with what consequences it can happen. Many disputes arise from assumptions that neither the law nor the contract supports. Here are six points that deserve attention.

1. Delay alone does not authorise termination

A breach may justify ending the contract, but not every delay has that effect. It is necessary to check what the contract provides, how relevant the breached obligation is and whether there was an opportunity to cure it.

2. Termination penalties are not automatic

Charging a penalty depends on contractual provision and on the specific situation. Penalty clauses may be challenged and, in some cases, reduced by the courts when disproportionate.

3. Silence is not consent

As a rule, the other party's lack of response does not amount to accepting a termination or new terms. Clear records and formal communications prevent conflicting interpretations.

4. Notice may be required

Many contracts, and some laws, require prior notice or formal notification before termination. Skipping this step can turn the party who was right into the party in breach.

5. Some obligations survive termination

Confidentiality, non-compete, accountability and the return of assets and documents are examples of duties that may remain after the contract ends.

6. Each contract requires its own analysis

There is no single rule. The type of contract, the wording of its clauses, the relationship between the parties and the history of performance all change the answer. Before terminating, the specific case should be analysed.

Informational content only. It does not constitute legal advice or a legal opinion.

All insights